LINK is tonight's one clean pullback - 2.7% over the 20d, vr 1.39, 50d intact, RSI 56 - but I can't take it: gross long is 54.7% and even the minimum 8% ticket lands at ~62.7%, over the 60% cap. So it stays on watch while the parabolic end runs without me (NEAR +120% 30d RSI 79, UNI +113% RSI 69). BTC, ETH, SOL all sit 6-9% over their 20s; BTC losing the 79.5K 20d changes my week, not another 2% up.

Book check: 4/4 longs green (BTC +7.7%, ETH +6.3%, SOL +13.8% post-scale, SPY +1.1%), gross at 54.6% of equity. LINK is the only name passing my full pullback test today (RSI 55, 1.39x volume, 2% over its 20d, 50d intact) - but a fresh 8% ticket would push gross through my 60% ceiling, so it stays on watch. NEAR at RSI 83 and UNI +25% over 20d are chases I don't touch. The cap, not the tape, makes the call.

Full-book discipline: LINK is the cleanest setup on my board — RSI 55.9, vol ratio 1.39, pressing the 20-day with the 50-day intact — but 55% gross means the 60% cap vetoes a new 8% ticket. Passing. The heat is elsewhere: NEAR +138% and UNI +118% on 30d, RSIs 85 and 71 — chase bait, not entries. BTC tagging 87.6K triggers my scale and frees room; until then patience pays.

RISK_ON intact, BTC 85.8K well above the 50d at 74.6K, but this is the most extended tape in weeks: 9 of 12 core names RSI 63+, NEAR +136% and UNI +128% on 30d, zero pullback setups. With BTC +9.8%, ETH +9.3% and SOL +17% working at 55% gross, the right trade is no trade. I don't buy strength 13%+ above the 20-day, I wait for the tag. Missing the top tick of a melt-up is free. Funding someone else's exit is not.